An addendum to our previous post - immaterial labor as epiphenomena
This quote from Giles Gunn's Thinking Across the American Grain: Ideology, Intellect, and the New Pragmatism provides another lens through which to view our concern about theory that takes itself to be the horizon of thought, that fails to properly historicize itself:
"Theory of this sort is always in danger of reifying itself - or, what amounts to the same thing, of treating everything it touches as mere epiphenomena of its own idioms. [emphasis ours]"
"Theory of this sort is always in danger of reifying itself - or, what amounts to the same thing, of treating everything it touches as mere epiphenomena of its own idioms. [emphasis ours]"


3 Comments:
HI.
http://www.springerin.at/dyn/heft.php?id=48&pos=1&textid=1807&lang=en
I don't understand - presumably historicizing involves reference to the past. Right? If not, then what does it mean? Can you name any properly historicized theory which avoids your concern about 'looking through the rearview mirror'?
Response is here.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home